AI security & evaluation

Prompt Injection Detector

Exploring a lightweight classification layer for untrusted text in LLM, retrieval, and agent workflows.

Experimental open source9 October 2026

The problem

An AI workflow can encounter instructions inside documents or tool responses. This project explores whether a small text classifier can help identify suspicious input before it reaches a model. Intended readers are developers investigating agent and retrieval security.

Scope and contribution

This is an experimental open-source project on the owner-confirmed GitHub and Hugging Face profiles. The public repository includes a training pipeline, detector, and evaluation material. This case note describes those artifacts; individual authorship details and deployment history have not been independently established.

Architecture

Input text → sentence embedding → logistic regression → injection score → application decision.

The repository uses a Sentence Transformer encoder with a scikit-learn classifier. The application remains responsible for deciding what a score means and which actions are permitted. Classification is only one potential signal in a wider security design.

Constraints and implementation choices

The compact classifier makes the approach inspectable. Its training examples are synthetic or template-derived, so they cannot represent every attack or legitimate request. Text classification does not itself enforce tool permissions or protect other modalities.

Evaluation and evidence

The repository documents adversarial evaluation and limitations. This website has not rerun those experiments and reports no independent benchmark. A reproducible review should pin the repository revision, record the test split, compare false positives and false negatives, and test held-out attack families.

Failure modes and next steps

Novel instructions may evade detection; legitimate text may be flagged. Human review, constrained tools, and separation of trusted instructions from external content remain necessary. Before integration, measure behavior on the actual workflow and agree an escalation policy.

Inspect the work

Source pages reviewed on 9 October 2026. Artifact documentation can change; use a pinned revision when reproducing results.

Have a similar question?Discuss a similar project

LET’S BUILD SOMETHING USEFUL

Start with a problem.
Let’s find the right approach.

Bring your idea, your existing prototype, or a workflow that could work better.

Discuss a Project